01dragonslayer
Iron Killer
Mad Referrer
Jacked Immortal
EG Auction Sniper
VIP Member
Shout Master
Mutated
Fully Loaded
- EG Cash
- 1,113,688
By Aadam |
In 2010, James Krieger conducted a Meta-analysis to find an answer to this question 1
James’ analysis found multiple sets were associated with a 40% greater hypertrophy response compared to single-set training.
They searched for studies that directly compared hypertrophy between high and low training volumes.
First: they evaluated the effects of volume within each study and found that higher volumes were associated with a 3.9% greater average increase in muscle mass compared with lower volumes.
They then split the data into two groups:
The lower volume condition was associated with a gain of 5.8% while the higher volume condition produced a gain of 8.2%.
Lastly, they split the studies into three groups:
There was a clear dose-response relationship between volume and hypertrophy.
In 2010, James Krieger conducted a Meta-analysis to find an answer to this question 1
James’ analysis found multiple sets were associated with a 40% greater hypertrophy response compared to single-set training.
However.
As Brad Schoenfeld pointed out 2:So, James and Brad recruited Dan Ogborn and decided to carry out a follow-up meta-analysis to discern the effects of weekly sets per muscle group on changes in muscle mass. 3While this paper provided good evidence in support of higher training volumes, there were some issues with the analysis. For one, James only looked at sets per muscle per workout; a potentially more important marker in determining the hypertrophic response is the weekly volume per muscle group. Moreover, only 8 studies qualified for inclusion in James’ analysis at the time, and only 3 of these studies used direct site-specific measures of muscle growth
They searched for studies that directly compared hypertrophy between high and low training volumes.
First: they evaluated the effects of volume within each study and found that higher volumes were associated with a 3.9% greater average increase in muscle mass compared with lower volumes.
They then split the data into two groups:
The lower volume condition was associated with a gain of 5.8% while the higher volume condition produced a gain of 8.2%.
Lastly, they split the studies into three groups:
There was a clear dose-response relationship between volume and hypertrophy.
Application
- Low volume approaches do build muscle. Performing less than 5 weekly sets per muscle produced an average gain of 5.4%. So if you have a busy schedule and can’t spend hours at the gym, you can rest assured lower volume training will suffice for muscle growth.
- However, higher volume approaches (minimum of 10 weekly sets per muscle) seem to be better if you’re wanting to maximise muscle growth. The higher volume studies (10+ sets) showed double the gains as performing less than 5 weekly sets per muscle (9.8% vs 5.4%).
- It’s not black or white: You should have periods of high volume training and periods of low volume training. Example: 4-6 weeks of building up volume and then 2-3 weeks of reduced volume.
- “Volume Threshold”: Everyone has an individual volume threshold – you should do enough so you’re progressing but not so much you risk injury or burning out. Build up your volume ‘capacity’ over time.
- The more advanced you become the more volume you’re going to need to continue eliciting growth.