How Many Sets for Muscle Growth?

01dragonslayer

Iron Killer
Mad Referrer
Jacked Immortal
EG Auction Sniper
VIP Member
Shout Master
Mutated
Fully Loaded
EG Cash
1,050,103
By Aadam |

In 2010, James Krieger conducted a Meta-analysis to find an answer to this question 1
HMS-1.webp
James’ analysis found multiple sets were associated with a 40% greater hypertrophy response compared to single-set training.

HMS-2.webpHowever.​

As Brad Schoenfeld pointed out 2:

While this paper provided good evidence in support of higher training volumes, there were some issues with the analysis. For one, James only looked at sets per muscle per workout; a potentially more important marker in determining the hypertrophic response is the weekly volume per muscle group. Moreover, only 8 studies qualified for inclusion in James’ analysis at the time, and only 3 of these studies used direct site-specific measures of muscle growth
So, James and Brad recruited Dan Ogborn and decided to carry out a follow-up meta-analysis to discern the effects of weekly sets per muscle group on changes in muscle mass. 3
HMS-3.webp
They searched for studies that directly compared hypertrophy between high and low training volumes.
hms-4.webp
First: they evaluated the effects of volume within each study and found that higher volumes were associated with a 3.9% greater average increase in muscle mass compared with lower volumes.
HMS-5.webp
They then split the data into two groups:
HMS-6.webp
The lower volume condition was associated with a gain of 5.8% while the higher volume condition produced a gain of 8.2%.
hms-7.webp
Lastly, they split the studies into three groups:
hms-8.webp
There was a clear dose-response relationship between volume and hypertrophy.
hms-9.webp

Application​

  • Low volume approaches do build muscle. Performing less than 5 weekly sets per muscle produced an average gain of 5.4%. So if you have a busy schedule and can’t spend hours at the gym, you can rest assured lower volume training will suffice for muscle growth.
  • However, higher volume approaches (minimum of 10 weekly sets per muscle) seem to be better if you’re wanting to maximise muscle growth. The higher volume studies (10+ sets) showed double the gains as performing less than 5 weekly sets per muscle (9.8% vs 5.4%).
  • It’s not black or white: You should have periods of high volume training and periods of low volume training. Example: 4-6 weeks of building up volume and then 2-3 weeks of reduced volume.
  • “Volume Threshold”: Everyone has an individual volume threshold – you should do enough so you’re progressing but not so much you risk injury or burning out. Build up your volume ‘capacity’ over time.
  • The more advanced you become the more volume you’re going to need to continue eliciting growth.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Similar threads

WHAT'S THE BEST NUMBER OF SETS FOR STRENGTH? I watch the way people in the gym lift. In a lot of...
Replies
0
Views
58
WHAT'S THE BEST NUMBER OF SETS FOR STRENGTH? I watch the way people in the gym lift. In a lot of...
Replies
0
Views
75
Effort vs. Volume vs. Load: What's the best way to build muscle? Effort, load, or volume-based...
Replies
0
Views
53

Latest threads

Back
Top