Sarm question

[GoPro]

so I have no experience with SARMS at all. But I was looking at a couple and wanted to try them stacked with a cycle of injectable AAS’s and an oral AAS.
But the ones I looked at and wanted to give a try work on the Androgen receptors.
So my question is......since they work on and bind to the Androgen receptors, will they make my AAS’s not perform to their full potential since they also are trying to bind to androgen receptors?? Because both will be in competition for receptor sites??
Sorry if this sound like a dumb question but I have zero experience with SARMs besides how to dose the ones that I have taken interest in.
-GoPro.

 

[R2D2]

i'm having trouble finding good scientific data one way or the other, but some theories and ideas are bandied about here:

Steroids compete for Androgen Receptors?

in my own experience, compounds seem to be synergistic, to an extent anyway.

 

[R2D2]

This seems to imply that they are not exactly sure of all the pathways that anabolics use to exert their effects, i think LOL:

Relative binding affinity of anabolic-androgenic steroids: comparison of the binding to the androgen receptors in skeletal muscle and in prostate, ... - PubMed - NCBI

 

[kingofclowns]

Rad140 was shown to reduce prostate size when administered with test prop... I use it for prostate protection. It works for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[R2D2]

it's supposed to have some nootropic effects as well. i have not tried it yet. the other sarms i've tried--lgd-4033 and mk-2866 (ostarine) i've found to be dry and fairly mild (my doses have been on the low side) although good for cutting and are also the only things that have made my hair shed.

 

[Heavyduty]

I've always had good results running gdub osta and rad 140 on cycle ..pumps are sicker endurance is insane and as u said rad 140 is good stuff for several different reasons ..

 

[GoPro]

All good info, thanks brothers!