Site Injection/Enhancement

[Anonymous]

Found this on another site and thought this is a good way to start discussion on seeing what chems other peeps use for site/muscle infections...
found on anasci- written by Will Synthetek,
Seems a lot of body builders are using this technique in hopes of bringing up weaker body parts, or to swell the show off muscles like the bi’s.

Well, I’m here to tell you that site injecting in hopes for increased size in that muscle maybe pointless unless you are using ester free gear.

The temporary swelling that occurs from drugs like sustanon are not going to result in permanent size.

What you are actually doing is increasing the risk of getting an infection in a site like bi, tri, or calves. You don’t want an infection there; it may lead to a hole in your muscle after the infection is removed.

So how can it work? It’s simple, once I explain the ester.

The esterified steroids you inject are useless at binding to the receptor until the ester is removed. Once the ester is removed the steroid is now active (can bind). What does this have to do with site injections? EVERYTHING.

The place where 98% of the esters will be removed is in the blood stream. 2% in the muscle cell. The enzymes, which remove the esters, are found in the blood stream.

So when you inject a drug like deca, it has to be taken from the injection site, into the blood stream where the ester is removed making it active, USEFUL to the growth process.

So, when the gear is active, it’s in the blood stream, now every muscle has as good chance in using (binding) the steroid. The steroid will bind with the androgen receptor, making a hormone-receptor complex, then enters the cell nucleus, where it binds to DNA, and activating specific genes. (you grow)

How do we increase the muscle at the site injection, that lagging calf, or weak tri… it’s very simple.

Want the answer? It’s ester free gear.

If the ester is already not present, then the steroid can bind directly with the androgen receptor of that muscle, giving that muscle the first crack at it. This will help to bring up those muscles that are having a harder time binding.

Types of drugs to use. Winstrol injectable, Testosterone Suspension, Liquid Anadrol, Injectable Dbol……..

One myth is that if you use oral (ester free) steroids with DMSO over the muscle in question it will increase that muscle’s size, and that muscle will get first crack at the steroid. This is not going to happen. DMSO releases the drug into the blood stream, then the drug gets distributed from the blood stream, and every muscle has the same chance of using the steroid.

Types of chems to use. Winstrol injectable, Testosterone Suspension, Liquid Anadrol, Injectable Dbol……..

Link: https://www.synthetek.com/site-injectionenhancement-by-willk/

 

[Anonymous]

Interesting stuff may have to try some of CM's naladrone no ester...

 

[HARD AT IT]

Awesome read..... Why is this is in the anonymous section??

 

[Blueedge]

Good read for sure.
From my personal experience lagging body parts can be fixed by adjusting workout routine.
Meaning u cant use the same approach for working all muscle grouos...ie. I can do 16 sets of back or legs and they will grow like hell, but if I do that with chest and bis they wont grow for shit. I found the sweet spot for my bis and chest is 6-8sets and working them 2-3 times a week..now im not saying this works for everyone but the theory is good.
If u have a lagging body part genetics maybe part of the cause but usually its due to over training or not hitting the group in a way to get max response. The same thing apllies if your nit growing at all and are stuck at a certain weight your training has to be changed..perwonally I dont belive kuch growth can be achieved by darting a certain compound into muscle grouos..BUT I could be wrong.

 

[TSizemore]

There is no Positive and Iminent compound that produces site growth. Primobolin is probably the best one, but the time frame and amount of growth is minimal and should not be relied on for the results you want. WORK, gives you the results you want.

 

[RockShawn]

For about 3 months I pinned my lats everyday with hGH and worked them over pretty damn hard. I saw the best growth ever for that part on me. I pinned some tne a few times pre workout but not enough to say it did any good but the injections kept that area "sore" like I had been lifting it even when I wasn't. I think there are definitely some positives to site injecting. I have some CM nne and may finish it off in the lats and see what happens the next 4 weeks.

 

[Anonymous]

Pretty damn interesting and very informative. Thanks for the post mane. 😉

 

[Anonymous]

Awesome read..... Why is this is in the anonymous section??

HARD AT IT
Posted in the wrong the part section,
my bad..

 

[Anonymous]

the concept of “spot growth” is a controversial one, we have seen localized alterations in tissue content with the administration of injectable drugs before. Insulin, for example, has been shown to cause a disproportionate increase in local fat mass at sites of repeated injections due to the lipogenic (fat building) nature of this hormone. Human growth hormone, which has lipolytic (fat metabolizing) properties, has likewise been shown to cause a localized loss of fat mass when injections are repeated in a particular site. Provided the drug being administered is active toward the tissues we are injecting it into, we can typically expect some level of disproportionate effect here, given the increased local drug levels.
Many bodybuilders swear by steroid spot injections, while others claim they offer little benefit over just normal injections in the glutes or thighs. Perhaps the disparity has to do with the drug administered. We need to keep in mind that most injectable steroids are not inherently active. The vast majority are esterified with some sort of fatty acid, such as nandrolone decanoate, testosterone cypionate, etc. The fatty acid slows the release of steroid from the site of injection, but in doing so, it also blocks its active 17-beta hydroxyl group (the site of the ester attachment). This means that until testosterone cypionate loses the cypionate, for example, it isn’t going to be able to affect muscle tissue, locally or otherwise.
Although esterified steroids might still offer some benefit as site enhancement agents, as local levels of free steroid are likely still going to be higher here, they are not ideal steroids to use for this purpose. In my experience, the number of really effective steroids for localized growth is very limited. This list would include only injectable stanozolol suspension, testosterone suspension, and the occasional injectable Dianabol product.

Esiclene
Esiclene is an old steroid with unique properties concerning temporary site enhancement. In fact, with the meager two milligrams per milliliter (2mg/ml) concentration of active steroid (formebolone) in this product, it wasn’t very good for anything else. As a muscle building anabolic, it was essentially worthless, in fact. But formebolone is uniquely very irritating to muscle tissue upon injection. Each 2ml-ampoule even used to include 20 milligrams of lidocaine, a local painkiller, to reduce, at least to some extent, the pain associated with administering this drug. But even so, it would still produce measurable soreness.
This would be accompanied by a measurable swelling of the muscle tissue surrounding the site of injection, however. When administered to smaller muscle groups, such as the biceps, triceps, delts or calves, it had a reputation for being an incredible site enhancement agent. Some claimed an inch or more increase in the biceps in only a few days of use. As such, it was said to be a favorite of competitive bodybuilders around the world, until its discontinuance some years back. Its effects lasted only a few days after the last injection was given, but this was enough to cause measurable improvements in the on-stage appearances of many bodybuilders over the years. Since its withdrawal years ago from the drug markets in all countries formerly making this steroid, competitors have been forced to look at other options. No real Esiclene remains on the black market at this time.

Synthol
Synthol is perhaps the most controversial product in the “site enhancement” category. Like Esiclene, it’s known more as a cosmetic agent than one capable of imparting true muscle growth. The premise behind Synthol is both simple and ingenious. The product is a simple blend of MCT oils (medium chain triglycerides), with benzyl alcohol added to promote sterility, and lidocaine to reduce injection site pain. Although the product was never overtly marketed as an injectable, that is the understood use for the product among consumers.
Once given this way, the MCT oil forms a slowly metabolizing deposit in the muscle tissue. Whereas the sesame or cottonseed oils used as vehicles in many steroid products will be metabolized in a matter of days, the full breakdown and excretion of the injected MCT oils is believed to be a process that takes months to years. As such, repeated use causes a measurable buildup of a bolus oil deposit in the muscle, stretching it to a measurable degree. This is believed by some to offer a growth promoting effect (stretching muscle fascia and allowing easier expansion and muscle accumulation), but for the most part it is really just an at-home alternative to collagen or silicone injections.
The controversy has to do with a few things. For one, some are offended that a product can be used to cosmetically enhance a competitor’s muscle to such a measurable and long-lasting degree. There is an air of “fakeness” surrounding the use of this product, causing many to keep their use of Synthol well in the closet. For others, keeping their use of Synthol a secret is an impossibility. These people are often referred to as “Synthol Freaks,” their use of the product blaringly obvious due to the monstrous and totally unnatural appearance of their overly “enhanced” muscles. Some of these guys walk around sporting permanent peaks in their biceps and swelling in their delts that no human being could naturally carry, steroids or otherwise.
I try to place no judgment on this myself, but for many, Synthol is a very inflammatory issue. Lastly, the theoretical health problems that could be associated with this product are scary. This includes the risk for cardiac embolism if a bolus dose of MCT oil were inadvertently injected (or found its way) into circulation. To date there have been no big stories concerning death from Synthol, however many speculate this is just a matter of time. At the very least, too many safety concerns remain unanswered for me to feel comfortable using it myself.

Nolotil
Nolotil is an old drug with a very new use. Specifically, this is a brand name for the analgesic (pain killing) agent metamizol, first used in this country back in the 1920s. Nolotil was discontinued from the drug markets in both the U.S. and Canada, however, due to the incidence of serious side effects in a small population of its users. Due to the fact that many other safer analgesics, such as opiates, were available, the drug agencies of these countries probably saw no reason to justify its continued sale. That hasn’t stopped bodybuilders in this country who now actively order this drug from pharmacies in other countries where it is still available. Nolotil is desirable right now because it has the peculiar, and quite measurable, ability to temporarily swell the muscle tissue at the site of injection. In this regard, it is very much like Esiclene, however, most users who have tried both claim Nolotil to be both more tolerable and more effective.
Like most drugs used for this purpose, the procedure for using Nolotil involves a series of repeat injections. This usually involves injecting 2.5-5.0 milliliters (1/2 to one 5-ml ampoule) deep into the belly of the muscle, after which a very light workout (a quick pump, really) is then done focusing on that muscle part to get blood flowing and disperse the drug. This is repeated for several days before the event/show in question, which optimizes the overall aggregate effect of the drug.
Bodybuilders have claimed increases of an inch in the arms in a single day with the use of this compound, more when taken for several days. Like Synthol and Esiclene, Nolotil may produce an uneven “bumpy” look if injected into larger muscle groups, so its use remains restricted to body parts like the biceps, triceps, delts and calves. The main drawback to this agent may be its potential side effects, which have been documented to include shock, kidney failure, sudden high fever, a drastic drop in white blood cell count and death. Although more serious reactions seem to occur in only one in 20,000 patents that have used this drug, they are serious enough when they do occur to at least be concerned when contemplating its non-medical use. For those who don’t mind assuming these risks, Nolotil may indeed turn out to be very worthwhile as a site enhancement agent.

 

[pappybay]

Very good information brothers.

 

[Anonymous]

I have heard so many people over the years say they can notice their muscles getting bigger from site injections and I always tell them they are wrong because if site injections cause site growth my ass would be HUGE from all the glute shots I have done!!! I am also not real certain about ester free gear causing site growth either, I think it may be possible to a degree but probably not as much as one would think to be even noticeable unless taken consistently over a long period of time in the same spot.

 

[tbonexl]

Well, my ass is huge! So I started doing delt shots years ago and they're not bad.. I really don't know about site injection enhancement. I think I just get a temporary swelling from the shot..

 

[bhcolex50x]

Very interesting