D
drakonrep
Guest
i dont think god bestowed anybody of any rights. why would god give different nations a different number of different rights? stating that any decision is made by god and thus stating this without evidence leads this into a religious discussion which is discussion between facts and fiction and raises more questions then gives answers.Hanzo date=1482266627 said:Yes, but as I said, the Representative Constitutional Republic guarantees true, equal Rights for all. These Rights are inalienable, as they are bestowed by our Creator, not by any man. This way, no man can deprive you of your Rights (AS LONG AS YOU'RE NOT A CRIMINAL). In a democracy it's play as you go, get a simple majority and anything can happen.Anything. That's why the FF's, in their infinite wisdom, set up a system of checks and balances, intended to make each branch wary and watchful of each other, which is a good thing.
Of course, our System of Governance has been corrupted by men (IRS, FED, all alphabet agencies, Civil War, direct election of Senators - which nullified the 10th Amendment), all these things were wrought by a government bent on usurpation of power which, in fact, was never delegated to them.
as far as i can see and based on evidence everything that we humans do is our own decision and stating laws and rights come from god is in my eyes invalid. our whole system is based on human actions and responsibilities and never evokes god to justify anything, as this is the default position.
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence (stating there is a good and even more stating that god is of a personal nature and thus is involved in our lives and even more that god somehow gave humans rigts) and i have not seen any proof of this in any way, thus this proposition of god giving rights is invalid until proof is shown. show me proof that god is real and gave humanrs rights and i will change my mind. until then god is a made up things by humans.
also, stating anything is unchangable is pretty dangerous and in my view a form of tyranny. that something regardless of mountains of logic and evidence cannot be changed, this is total oppression, nobody would accept this. some things should be much harder to change then others yes but not impossible. this would mean obvious laws made by humans were perfect but there is no definition of perfection thus a small group is oppressing others with laws that cannot be changed.
not subject to change = worst possible thing. dictator in all aspects
everything should be subject to change, absolutely everything. and especially laws that govern people.
i state that we the humans make our laws and we learn and evolve those laws. what is law now will change in 300yrs and what was law 300yrs ago is no longer law now. and this is good. anything can happen. freedom. no doctrine or fixed anything. anything is subject to change and discussion.