- EG Cash
- 12,249
LittleTom said:Its really fucking funny because if i follow the logic here (i use that term loosely) your "god" would still have to come from another god who came from another god.... Its FUCKING HILARIOUS. You argue its impossible for something to come from nothing yet your magic man is the exception to the rule. Instead of the realistic possibility of shit floating around in space coming together to form something your answer IS A MYTHOLOGICAL CREATURE WAVING A WAND!!! but..... Where did he come from if NOTHING CAN COME FROM NOTHING. Lol.. Just insaine.
You seem to be overlooking the obvious contradiction in your answer.
Think of 'NO THING'.
Describe it.
Give us a description of 'NOTHING', please.
Most people describe it something like 'completely dark space'.
But even completely dark space is 'something'.
It can be filled with whatever, so even empty space still IS NOT 'nothing'.
I think it was Jonathan Edwards who once said "'Nothing' is what sleepy rocks dream of."
Now, in your answer you said, "shit floating around in space coming together to form something."
What you seem to be overlooking is that fact that in your explaination "shit" is creating "something".
But once you remove the "shit", and are left with 'NO SHIT', how can 'NO SHIT' create 'ALL SHIT' and EVERYONE IN IT.
You see, the good ole Law of Cause and Effect is the problem.
The Law of Cause and Effect says that every effect must have a cause greater than itself, and that no effect is greater than the cause.
So, are we to believe that 'NO SHIT' MAGICALLY became 'SOME SHIT', and that 'SOME SHIT' MAGICALLY became more and more and more complex 'SHIT' until finally our big brains are sitting around arguing about that 'SHIT'?
'GOD creating' DOES NOT VIOLATE THE LAW OF CAUSE AND EFFECT!!!
Here's why:
Remember, every effect must have cause greater that itself.
Here's a brief example:
Let’s look at the law of cause and effect. Natural Law has no exceptions. This is definitely true of the law of cause and effect, which is the most universal and most certain of all laws. Simply put, the law of cause and effect states that every material effect must have an adequate cause that existed before the effect.
Material effects without adequate causes do not exist. Also, causes never occur after the effect. In addition, the effect never is greater than the cause. That is why scientists say that every material effect must have an adequate cause. The river did not turn muddy because the frog jumped in; the book did not fall off the table because the fly landed on it. These are not adequate causes. For whatever effects we see, we must present adequate causes.
Five-year-olds are wonderful at using the law of cause and effect. We can picture a small child asking: “Mommy, where do peaches come from?” His mother says that they come from peach trees. Then the child asks where the trees come from, and his mother explains that they come from peaches. You can see the cycle. Eventually the child wants to know how the first peach tree got here. He can see very well that it must have had a cause, and he wants to know what that cause was.
One thing is for sure: the Universe did not create itself! We know this for a scientific fact, because matter cannot create matter. If we take a rock that weighs 1 pound and do 50,000 experiments on it, we never will be able to produce more than 1 pound of rock. So, whatever caused the Universe could not have been material.
GOD is the Great UnCaused Cause!!!
He is the Cause greater than ALL effects.
He is UnCaused because he IS the Cause of ALL effects.
He is all powerful.
He is outside of time and space.
He is eternal. (infinity + 1 is still infinity)
It's not hard to believe that an all powerful, all knowing God, who is eternal and outside of time and space created 'EVERYTHING'.
It takes MUCH MORE FAITH TO BELIEVE 'NO THING' CREATED 'EVERYTHING'.
Why, because 'NO THING' DOES NOT EVEN EXIST, so how can it create 'EVERYTHING' THAT DOES EXIST?
Give us just 1 example of this happening in the natural world that we can test.
You and Tuna want to CLAIM science backs up what you are saying.
Well, give us just 1 example of 'SOMETHING' coming from 'NOTHING'!!!
JUST 1 thing that qualifies under the 'Scientific Method'!!!
LT AND TUNA, let's see your evidence that qualifies under the 'Scientific Method'.
'Scientific Method' says that it must be able to be quantified in a lab.
That means, it must be proven true or proven false in the lab to be called 'Scientific Method'!!!
Everything you both have provide thus far has been rhetoric, conjucture and bro-science.
Let's see real science from you two, please.
8) 8) 8)